FITTA tool

Estimate the load you could lift for one clean rep

Compare Epley, Brzycki and Lombardi plus a load-percentage table

These calculators provide estimates based on population-level formulas and do not replace assessment by a dietitian, physician or exercise professional.

Your data

Use a set taken close to failure. Above 10 reps the estimate loses accuracy.

Take this 1RM into today’s session in FITTA

FITTA calculates 1RM with Epley, Brzycki, and Lombardi and applies the percentage to the sets you log.

Open in FITTA

Practical guide

How to use FITTA better.

A one-rep max (1RM) is the heaviest load you can complete for a single clean repetition on a given lift. A true max-out needs a long warmup and a fresh nervous system. Most training cycles estimate 1RM from a hard submaximal set taken near failure. This calculator runs Epley (1985), Brzycki (1993), and Lombardi (1989) on the same load in kilograms and the same rep count. The headline is the average of the three, plus a percentage chart. It is an estimate, not a substitute for a qualified strength coach.

What a 1RM is and what the formula can see

A 1RM is the heaviest complete repetition on the lift and variation you tested. High-bar, low-bar, and front squat do not share a max. Paused bench and touch-and-go bench do not either. The formula sees two numbers only: the set’s load, in kilograms, and the completed reps taken near failure. It does not see range of motion, pause length, belt, straps, sleep, caffeine, a calorie deficit, or the RIR you left on the bar. Convert first if you think in pounds: divide by 2.205.

Read more

The estimate exists because a true max is expensive in neural fatigue and joint risk. Competitive lifters save it for peaks. The rest of the year, programming uses percentages of a training 1RM, refreshed from heavy sets. An 80 kg (176 lb) set of 8 with 3 to 4 RIR describes a different 1RM than the same load at 0 or 1 RIR. Stay in the 2-to-8-rep range. Error grows past 10 reps. At 1 rep all three formulas return the load itself.

The calculator does not diagnose relative strength and does not compare people. A 100 kg (220 lb) bench from a 70 kg lifter and from a 110 kg lifter are not the same fact. Read the number only for the movement, range, and equipment of the input set.

How to calculate with Epley, Brzycki, and Lombardi

All three formulas take load w and completed reps r. Epley (1985): 1RM = w × (1 + r / 30). Brzycki (1993): 1RM = w × 36 / (37 − r). Lombardi (1989): 1RM = w × r to the power of 0.1. When r equals 1, FITTA returns w with no coefficient. The page computes all three and highlights the arithmetic mean. Inputs are metric; 80 kg is about 176 lb and 100 kg is about 220 lb.

Read more

Worked example: 80 kg for 8 reps. Epley: 80 × (1 + 8 / 30) = 80 × 1.2667 = 101.3 kg. Brzycki: 80 × 36 / (37 − 8) = 2,880 / 29 = 99.3 kg. Lombardi: 80 × 8^0.1 ≈ 80 × 1.2311 = 98.5 kg. The mean is (101.3 + 99.3 + 98.5) / 3 = 99.7 kg (about 220 lb).

Second example, 100 kg for 5: Epley 100 × (1 + 5 / 30) = 116.7 kg; Brzycki 100 × 36 / 32 = 112.5 kg; Lombardi 100 × 5^0.1 ≈ 117.5 kg; mean 115.6 kg. At 10 reps Epley and Brzycki meet at w × 4 / 3; Lombardi sits lower. Past 10, Brzycki inflates as the 37 − r denominator shrinks. FITTA calculates with these coefficients and rounds to one decimal place.

The load-percentage table

After the mean, the page applies the classic 1RM percentage chart used in strength programming: 100 percent for 1 rep, 95 for 2, 93 for 3, 90 for 4, 87 for 5, 85 for 6, 80 for 8, 75 for 10, 70 for 12, and 65 for 15. On a 99.7 kg mean that is about 94.7 kg for doubles, 89.7 kg for sets of 4, 86.7 kg for 5, 84.7 kg for 6, 79.8 kg for 8, 74.8 kg for 10, 69.8 kg for 12, and 64.8 kg for 15.

Read more

The chart is a training convention, not a physiological law. Lifters with more slow-twitch fiber or more endurance work often squeeze extra reps at the same percentage. Lifters who are strong at a max and undertrained at volume fail sooner. Use the table to build the week, not to predict the exact failure point of that session.

If the 1RM came from an 8-rep set, 80 percent will land near the load you already used. Use the chart for the other rep targets and for weekly progression, not to circularly confirm the same set. The percentage belongs to the lift you tested. Do not carry 80 percent of your bench onto overhead press, or of your deadlift onto squat.

How to read the calculator output

The headline is the mean of Epley, Brzycki, and Lombardi, in kilograms. The three separate values are the cross-check. A 2 to 4 percent spread among the formulas is expected at 3 to 8 reps. If one value sits well above the others, the set likely went past 10 reps: Brzycki climbs quickly as 37 − r gets small. Lombardi, being a power function, rises more slowly and is often the lowest on longer sets.

Read more

Read the 1RM only on the lift you tested, with the same range, pause, and equipment rules. Compare it with the last estimate of that same movement. A 2 to 3 percent rise over 4 to 6 weeks, with stable technique, is real progress. A 10 percent jump in seven days is almost always a closer-to-failure input set, or a previously easy training load, not a new physiological ceiling.

Outside a plausible band, recheck load, reps, and RIR. A 1RM below a triple you already hit, or 15 to 20 percent above recent history, points to a bad input. The calculator cannot see spotters, a hex bar, a mixed grip, or how hard a deficit day drained glycogen from the test set.

Common mistakes when you estimate 1RM

The costliest error is an easy set. The formulas were fit on sets taken to fatigue or near it. Leaving 4 or 5 RIR underestimates the max in roughly the same proportion as the reps you left in the tank. The second error is going past 10 or 12 reps: the load-rep relationship stops being nearly linear, Brzycki loses its footing, and Epley overshoots.

Read more

Mixing units is third: typing pounds into a kilogram field inflates 1RM by about 2.2 times. Counting a partial, a chest bounce, or a cut range invents a max that does not exist on the full lift. Recalculating every session from a warmup set pollutes the log. Applying the same percentage to every exercise ignores that reps available at 80 percent differ among squat, deadlift, and curl.

Treating the estimate as a meet max and attempting it the same day stacks test-set fatigue onto a true single. On an aggressive deficit or short sleep, the input set is already suppressed and the formula only echoes that bad day.

  • Use a near-failure set of 2 to 8 reps
  • Enter load in kilograms, not pounds
  • Do not estimate from more than 10 reps
  • Do not count partials or bounce reps
  • Recalculate on the same lift and variation
  • Do not attempt the estimated max on test day

Using 1RM in training and diet

Program the week from percentages of the mean. Max strength lives at 85 to 100 percent, for 1 to 5 reps. Hypertrophy and heavy volume live at 65 to 85 percent, for 6 to 15. Bar-speed work usually sits at 40 to 60 percent of 1RM, not of a 10-rep set. Refresh the estimate every 4 to 6 weeks with a new heavy set, or when working weight yields 1 to 2 extra reps at the same load.

Read more

In a deficit, training 1RM can fall even with stable technique. Do not chase the old number by cutting more calories. Take the input set on a day with reasonable glycogen, not at the end of a dry cut. Protein at 1.6 to 2.2 g per kg (about 0.7 to 1.0 g per lb) and enough sleep support the heavy set that feeds the formula. A 200 to 400 kcal surplus helps the max rise, but it does not replace progressive overload.

In the app, FITTA calculates 1RM with the same coefficients and ties the number to that day’s session, weekly volume, and what you eat and drink. This page is the starting point. The plan lives in the ongoing log of sets, meals, and recovery.

Frequently asked questions

What is a 1RM

A 1RM is the heaviest load you can complete for one clean repetition on a specific lift. It applies only to that movement, range of motion, and equipment. It is not relative strength and does not transfer automatically from bench to squat to deadlift. The formulas on this page estimate that max from a hard submaximal set. Only a true max-out measures 1RM directly.

How do I calculate my 1RM

Take the load in kilograms and the completed reps near failure, ideally between 2 and 8. Convert pounds by dividing by 2.205. Epley: load times 1 plus reps over 30. Brzycki: load times 36, divided by 37 minus reps. Lombardi: load times reps to the power of 0.1. This page runs all three and highlights the mean. At one rep the answer is the load itself.

What is the Epley 1RM formula

Epley (1985) estimates 1RM = w × (1 + r / 30), with w in kilograms and r the completed reps. The 1/30 term is about 3.33 percent of the load for each extra rep. At 80 kg (176 lb) for 8 reps the result is 101.3 kg. The equation is linear and, past 10 reps, tends to overestimate a true max. FITTA calculates with that coefficient.

What is the difference between Epley and Brzycki

Epley grows linearly with reps. Brzycki (1993) uses 1RM = w × 36 / (37 − r) and is tighter across 2 to 10 reps. At 10 reps the two meet at w × 4 / 3. Below 10, Brzycki usually sits a little under Epley. Past 10, Brzycki inflates as the denominator shrinks. Lombardi, with exponent 0.1, climbs more slowly than either.

How many reps should I use to estimate 1RM

The most stable window is 2 to 8 reps taken to 0 or 1 RIR. Sets of 3 to 6 on squat, bench, and deadlift usually miss by less. Past 10 reps the error grows on all three formulas, especially Brzycki. An easy set underestimates the max. Warmup sets do not count. Retest with a heavier load if you went past 10 reps.

What is a 1RM percentage chart

It is the classic map from a slice of 1RM to an approximate rep count: 100 percent for 1, 95 for 2, 93 for 3, 90 for 4, 87 for 5, 85 for 6, 80 for 8, 75 for 10, 70 for 12, and 65 for 15. It is for building the week, not for predicting the exact failure point. The curve shifts with the lift, volume history, and fiber type.

Does an estimated 1RM replace a real max test

No. The estimate is a training proxy, typically off by a few percentage points depending on the lift and how close to failure the set was. A true single remains the only direct measure. Use the estimate for weekly percentages and save a real max for a peak, with a full warmup and stable technique, under professional guidance.

These calculators provide estimates based on population-level formulas and do not replace assessment by a dietitian, physician or exercise professional.